Film Review: "Clash of the Titans" (directed by Louis Leterrier, 2010)

It begins in space. A voiceover describes the backstory of pretty much everything that has happened in the universe up to the current plot. The audience finds later that this is narrated by Io, played by Gemma Arterton, who seems to be the "goddess of exposition." She lets the audience know that Perseus, played by Sam Worthington, is also a demigod who ends up being raised by a poor fisherman, played by Pete Postlethwaite. These are the only characters really worth caring about, and the latter one dies about 5 minutes in when Hades, god of the underworld, hits his boat with a fireball.

Perseus survives the fireball, and is picked up by some soldiers from Argos, the city that likes to piss off the gods. Hades shows up in Argos, kills some people, and tells them that if they don't sacrifice the princess then he will destroy the whole city. And they've got like a week to think about it.

The powers that be in Argos change their mind a few times about Perseus, shifting between seeing him as some guy and seeing him as a spy from the gods who caused all their troubles. Io shows up and does her thing, telling Perseus that he is a son of Zeus and pretty much the details of his life between conception and being picked up by the fisherman (at least they made sure the goddess of exposition was nice to look at and listen to).

So everyone decides that Perseus isn't so bad and they agree that the best plan of action is to figure out a way to kill the Kraken (the enormous hellbeast that will destroy the town) rather than give up the princess, since she is pretty and nice and apparently worth more than, at best, a few guys from the questing party, and, at worst, the entire town.

Now this is based on Greek epics, and the values of the characters won't always match up with modern ways of thinking, but wouldn't giving up the princess be by far the best option? Sure, she's a nice gal, but the loss of human life one way or another will be much greater if they don't give her up. I suppose it's the principle of the thing, "millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute," but that kind of thinking got Argos into this mess in the first place. Maybe this is not a direct fault of the filmmakers, but trying to adapt ancient myths can make the protagonists seem a bit foolish and hard-headed compared to modern stories.

Anyway, Perseus and some guys head out and walk through a bunch of rock quarries. None of the guys on the team are very interesting or memorable. There are a couple guys who are supposed to pass for comic relief, but either forget to have screen presence or have the sense of humor of someone's dad. Io tags along too, so there is something interesting to look at, since the sets are pretty generic and unremarkable. Perseus and his pals experience some decent action scenes, with special effects ranging from awesome (Pegasus) to video game (Medusa). Everyone in his crew dies, but Perseus gets what he needs and eventually saves the day to a really good soundtrack. The city gets half-destroyed by the Kraken (who is rendered at a giant scale that is actually very well-done and believable) but it's cool because they stood up to the gods and the princess is ok. Oh, and Io gets better.

The ending kind of plays weird tricks with the themes. The motivation for the proposed destruction of Argos was Hades' attempt to prove to Zeus that men are ruled better by fear than love. This can be said to be one of the major themes discussed in the film. Hades is proven wrong, at least for the moment, as humanity rises up to defeat him instead of cowering in fear. Obviously, ruling by love is better, as Zeus comes to realize (and always suspected). However, a few facts get in the way:

1. People were rebelling when Zeus was ruling by love
2. Hades really just wasn't powerful enough to rule by fear
3. Argos was saved by a demigod, with help from the gods

To be fair, point 3 is mentioned, which suggests a partnership between humanity and Olympus is in everyone's best interest, although it implies that the gods should fear man just as much as man fears the gods. So the gods are really too weak to rule and fail to inspire love. Essentially, Hades was right. It is best to rule by fear, you just need to be powerful enough to actually do it.

This theme isn't bad, it's just different from the conclusion everyone in the story has come to. Which, again, makes the characters seem thick-headed and foolish. I have not seen the original "Clash of the Titans" nor I am familiar enough with the source material to comment on the writing, but the audience is more likely to sympathize with the characters if they make choices and conclusions that hold to some kind of consistent value system, preferably close to the audience's own.

Of course, deciding to give up the princess and submit to Hades wouldn't make a good action movie, and we'd miss out on some neat action (in the always-interesting classical mythology setting), and a great soundtrack.

Film Review: Kick-Ass (directed by Matthew Vaughn, 2010)

"Kick-Ass" is exactly what it says on the label. There's "kick" (literal violence and fast-paced action), there's "ass" (the idiot or as a sexual term), and it's all-around pretty vulgar. In spite of (or because of) these facts, the film does "kick ass" in the sense of being one of the most entertaining movies released this year.

When first hearing about this movie a few months ago, the first thing that comes to mind is "oh look, a 'Watchmen' ripoff." That thought was not entirely correct. Although it continues the deconstructionist perspective made popular through Alan Moore's opus, "Kick-Ass" is a much more conventional story. It would more accurate to say "Kick-Ass" has more in common with Batman or the Spirit: typical people with no powers track down criminals because it's fun, profitable, and feels good. The only difference is that the characters are aware of and directly inspired by the superheroes of fiction.

The film's plot follows the classic superhero tropes as closely as a "BIFF!" follows a Batman right hook. There's the Kick-Ass origin story, narrated by the eponymous protagonist, which is only a slightly more realistic look on the early growing pains for teenage Peter Parker in Raimi's "Spiderman." Big Daddy is Batman is all but name (Hit-Girl is the character who stretches things a bit). The plot is very typical: treachery, fake death, hero/sidekick versus villain/sidekick final battle, and of course a very large Chekhov's gun. Oh, and there's some boring teenage romance subplot that apparently wasn't in the comic.

What makes "Kick-Ass" stand out is action, and that action is centered around the infamous character Hit-Girl, making this probably the first film with interesting action since "The Matrix" ruined it forever. Hit-Girl is by far the most competent of all the heroes in "Kick-Ass," as well as the most violent and foul-mouthed of any character in the film. Oh, and she's 12 years old, and played by an actress roughly the same age. Many are citing this as (1) vile and immoral for a child actor to be doing and (2) a poor example to children. While I am no apologist for this film, let me make a quick digression to address this.

First, Hit-Girl is an unrealistic child superhero only in how restrained she is. If anyone gave a middle-schooler the ability to physically take out anyone (which Hit-Girl pretty much does) I don't think he or she would keep it to only "bad guys." The kid would be whooping kids on the playground just for kicks, and doing it with a larger quantity (but poorer quality) of profane language. So is Hit-Girl a vile abomination or a typical middle-schooler? Probably something in-between (if there is a difference).

Second, there may be pretty colors and a lot of action, but "Kick-Ass" is NOT a family movie. I know this happened with "Watchmen" too. Parents can do what they want, but at least check online to see the content of a RATED 'R' FILM before taking children to it. There shouldn't be complaints about "bad examples" from a film that is not meant to be for children. This has a lot to do with the Western idea that comics are cartoons are "kids' media," but that is a post for another day.

Anyway, despite its decidedly family un-friendly moments, there is a running theme about doing the right thing, just because it is right. As the protagonist says, "With no power comes no responsibility," but that doesn't mean we should shirk from doing the right thing. Our world doesn't have Spiderman or Superman to do it for us, real people need to step up and help their fellow man. Perhaps that is what the heroes have been trying to teach us all along.

"Kick-Ass" expertly finds the balance that makes an action movie bearable. The plot is nothing special, but the action makes up for it. The story and characters can be vulgar, but also have redeeming qualities. A good litmus test is to watch the mature trailer: if you can bear the vulgarity, you should have an enjoyable experience.

TV Review: “Doctor Who” (Series 5, episode 1: “The Eleventh Hour,” BBC)

At long last, the wait is over. After a year containing five specials, the new season of “Doctor Who” is finally here, and as good as ever. For the uninitiated, “Doctor Who” is a British science-fiction series centering around the exploits of the Doctor, a very human-looking alien who travels through time and space in a spaceship called the TARDIS (which looks like a police box, but is bigger on the inside) with a usually female human sidekick, known among fans as the companion, and known in the show by her name. “Doctor Who” is one of the longest-running franchises ever, running more or less continuously from 1963 to the late 80s, and then rebooting in 2005 in the same continuity. This is made possible by the fact that the Doctor's timelord species can “regenerate,” which conveniently occurs any time the series needs to switch actors.

This is quite significant for this review, as this episode begins the run of the eleventh incarnation of the Doctor (and third since the reboot), as played by Matt Smith. But the Doctor's not the only thing that's new. The show now has a new head writer, Steven Moffatt. Although Moffatt has written a episode or two in each previous season (and usually the best episode of the season), he has never written any episodes that deal with a major story arc. Fortunately, “The Eleventh Hour,” written by Moffatt, shows no hesitation at all.

It begins with the Doctor hurtling towards earth, newly regenerated, his TARDIS in flames. He crashes into the garden of a young girl named Amelia Pond who is scared by a crack in the wall of her room. The Doctor discovers an alien convict somehow used the crack to escape from a space prison. The Doctor needs to use the TARDIS for something, and he tells Amelia he'll be back in five minutes, but accidentally overshoots by twelve years. Amelia is now grown up, and the rest of the episode continues with the alien authorities trying to find the convict and the Doctor making sure the earth isn't incinerated by the authorities.

There are really a lot of strengths in the writing of this episode, the basic plot is typical for the series, but there are already references to the major season arc, with the crack in the wall being somehow related to tears in the fabric of the universe. It's fast-paced and never boring, and so far seems to suggest a theme this season of the Doctor as a protector and rule-enforcer.

Matt Smith plays the Doctor a little wackier than the great David Tennant, the previous actor, but was overall endearing and had the right character attributes. The only critique would be that Smith is a bit too generic and too close to Tennant's character, but as this is his first episode he still has time to come into his own as the season progresses. Karen Gillan's Amy Pond seems to avoid the typical companion's penchant for whining and being generally irritating, so the season is really looking good as far as characters go (these two will probably be the only recurring ones).

“The Eleventh Hour” was a strong episode that didn't take a lot of risks with story or character development, but did manage to entertain and establish all new actors and a new story arc, giving a lot of hope for the new season and the future of the series.